宝春

各位同学们，为了督促帮助大家持续提升英语能力，培君老师们特意给大家准备了托福每日一包。每天覆盖听说读写内容，坚持完成两周以上，就能见到自己的英语能力不断上涨哟。

1. 听写包答案：

Listen to a conversation between a student and his professor.

Professor: I have some good news for you, one of the students who was signed up for the summer term at the field station next year won’t be attending after all.
Your name’s first on the waiting list, so if you still want to do it, the space is available.
Student: Oh, that’s terrific!
Professor: You were also interested in doing an independent research project next summer, right?
Student: Yeah, on salt marsh restoration, but that was before, when I thought I wasn’t going to get into the field station.
Professor: Well, you can still do it if you want.
I looked over your application for the independent research project, and it looks strong, I approved it.
And you’d have even more resources there at the field station, so...
Student: The field station and an independent study, but the summer term is a few weeks shorter than a regular term.
Professor: Well, it’s up to you, you’d have to work hard but I think you can do very well.
Professor Garfield, one of the professors over at the field station...
Student: Yeah, I’ve heard of him.
Professor: Yes, well. Professor Garfield has been doing research on salt marshes for years, assessing human impact and methods of salt marsh restoration.
He is willing to oversee your project.
Student: Wow! That’s too good an opportunity to pass up.
请听一个学生和教授之间的对话。
教授：我有一些好消息要告诉你，有一个报名参加明年实验站的夏季学期的学生终归去不了了。
你的名字在候补名单的第一个，所以如果你还想做的话，这个位置现在是空着的。
学生：哦，太棒了！
老师：你还有兴趣明年夏天做一个独立的研究项目，对吧？
学生：是的，关于盐沼恢复的，但那是之前我以为我进不了实验站的时候的想法。
教授：如果你有这个想法的话还是可以做啊。
我看过你申请进行独立研究项目的申请表了，看起来很有力，我批准了。
而且你在实验站那里会有更多资源，所以......
学生：兼顾实验站和一个独立研究啊，可是夏季学期比正常的学期要短好几个星期。
教授：那就要看你自己了，你必须得非常努力，不过我觉得你会做得很好的。
Garfield教授，就是实验站那边的教授之一......
学生：是的，我听说过他。
教授：没错，是这样的，Garfield教授进行盐沼的研究已经好多年了，他一直在评估人类的影响以及恢复盐沼的方法。
他愿意指导你的项目。
学生：哇，这个机会太棒了，决不能错过啊。

2.阅读包答案：

我也知道，在日本和瑞典这些在医疗方面的花费比我们少得多的国家，其人民比我们更长寿、更健康。

3.写作包答案：

The question whether urban parks should charge an entrance fee or not has been a source of controversy for a long time. On the one hand, some people claim that urban parks, supposed to be places where people have leisure and entertainment, are public establishments that have been created with taxpayers’ money and thus should be free. On the other hand, some others maintain that, considering China’s large population and lack of a sense of civic duty, once the parks are free of charge, they will not be properly managed and will inevitably be damaged. When considering opinions of both sides, I am inclined to the latter view. It’s certain that free entry to urban parks should proceed with economic development, as it needs financial support. Hence, the current economic level in China reflects that free entry to parks can only be realized step by step.