找回密码
 立即注册

微信扫一扫,快捷登录!

发表于 2015-5-13 09:42:27 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


against_wide-570a7bf3a0ee0fbaa46055539e188f8aac23a5d4-s300-c85.jpg

Following the Republican Party's losses in the 2012 elections, there has been a lot of hand-wringing about what the party should do to improve its electoral fortunes.


Some argue that the GOP should moderate its positions on social issues, as well as policies that affect income inequality and social mobility, and that it should embrace compromise as a way to attract more voters. But others say that changing its positions risks alienating the core Republican base and diluting the party's conservative message — doing more damage in the end.
That hot topic was the subject of the latest Intelligence Squared U.S. debate, which pitted moderate New York Times columnist David Brooks and former U.S. Rep. Mickey Edwards against conservative talk radio host Laura Ingraham and Ralph Reed of the Faith & Freedom Coalition. The motion of the Oxford-style debate was: "The GOP Must Seize the Center or Die."
Before the debate, the audience voted 65 percent in favor of the motion and 14 percent against, with 21 percent undecided. After the debate, 65 percent remained in favor of the idea that the GOP should seize the center, but 28 percent were opposed — meaning the side arguing against seizing the center changed more minds and won the debate.

欢迎来到水木紫荆书院!

663

主题

2696

帖子

1万

积分

Tutor

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
13724
发表于 2015-5-13 10:47:37 | 显示全部楼层
该会员没有填写今日想说内容.

663

主题

2696

帖子

1万

积分

Tutor

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
13724
发表于 2015-5-13 10:49:12 | 显示全部楼层
该会员没有填写今日想说内容.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|培君水木书院-源自清华的高端学习平台 ( 闽ICP备13013230号 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-18 21:52 , Processed in 0.151039 second(s), 50 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表